Saturday, January 17, 2009

Blacks Still Pushing For Government Slavery Apology


Talks of an apology for the horrific act of slavery has made its way back to the surface. 

Last year during the summer of 2008 The White House, decided to give a formal apology for slavery from the 1870's - 1965, although slavery has existed since the early 1500's.

In 2007 this same issue was brought up in The White House, but President George W. Bush, chose not to entertain this topic. Then out of nowhere, The House decided to have a vote on a slavery apology. I guess since a black person is running for the presidency, it'd make sense to bring it up as to not look too racist? 

Unfortunately, the vote was carried out in a fashion that was unusual for votes to be carried out in The White House. The vote was passed on a voice vote and not in written format, and the resolution was non-binding meaning that the vote can be overturned at any time. 

This way of voting seemed odd to me, especially since it isn't the traditional way of voting. 


This was the first time a branch of the federal government EVER apologized for slavery, so you'd think they'd  want it to be a binding agreement so that it can't be overturned.


I didn't accept the fake apology last year and I never will until it's documented properly, made a binding agreement, and well overdue reparations are distributed. Hopefully, President-Elect Obama will make those necessary changes.

Several states have already jumped on the bandwagon issuing and documenting formal apologies for the act of slavery: Florida, Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, New Jersey and Virginia. 

Two days ago the Chairman of Georgia's Black Caucus, Rep. Al Williams, re-introduced a resolution in a letter asking for the state of Georgia's official apology. And back in 2007, Mr. Williams tried sending a letter to the Governor of Georgia Sonny Perdue, asking for an apology. 


Governor Perdue simply responded, "Those of us in public office today, I think we’re called to live our lives and inspire our citizens to live their lives so that our children and grandchildren have nothing to apologize for." 



What Gov. Perdue said had absolutely NOTHING to do with an apology for slavery. His response was an awful cop out, and to this day he still refuses to join the other six states with a formal apology.

Records from the 19th century at the University of Georgia, prove that Georgia owned and sold slaves so why doesn't Perdue acknowledge this fact? But what can you expect from a state that still hangs the confederate flag high for all to see? Maybe Perdue is scared that the more states to apologize -- than sooner or later reparations won't be to far behind?


2009 LA

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Happy Birthday Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

In memory of our Honorable Prince of Peace, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. This week lets take off our hats and open our hearts to a TRUE AMERICAN HERO.

Happy Birthday Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

2009 PoLiTik



Wednesday, January 14, 2009

San Jose Students Tour 'Civil Rights' Landmark On The Way To Inauguration


A group of students from San Jose, California, are heading towards Washington D.C. for the inauguration of President-Elect Barack Obama. In their travels, the students have decided to stop off and visit different Civil Rights Landmarks in different States.  

(Emmet Till seen above-l with mother and seen-r dead)

The students first visit was to Money, Mississippi, where in 1955 a fourteen year old boy by the name of Emmett Till was brutally murdered by the hands of white men simply because he whistled at a white woman in a grocery store. 

 (Bryant grocery store seen-r)

The young teenager was taken from his uncle's home in the middle of the night and dragged to a barn. At the barn is where Emmet Till was wrapped in barb wire, his genitals was chopped off along with other parts of his body; he was shot in the head and then thrown into the river.

Fortunately, Till's body was found and returned to his mother. The Mississippi police officers were found to be apart of the murder, and they made the decision that Till's body wouldn't be viewed in order to cover up what was done to him. But Till's mother made sure she had an open casket funeral in order to show the community and the world, what was done to her baby. 

Reading the stories and looking at the pictures, I was completely mortified. The two white men that murdered Emmet Till were acquitted of all charges, even though there were strong witnesses that testified about what they heard and saw. Because the witnesses were black people, their voices weren't heard by the racist court.


(J.W. Milam seen-l and Roy Bryant seen-r who murdered Emmet Till were acquitted, while laughing with their wives in the courthouse)

As I listened to the San Jose students talk about their visit to the courthouse where the two men were acquitted, the church where Emmett Till's funeral was, and Bryant Grocery store where Till whistled at the woman; I cried. My tears were from the pain of the past, and as I saw a picture of Emmett Till before he was mangled beyond recognition I softly uttered the words, "Your death was not in vain. Thank you, Jesus."

Who would have known that having a black president would ignite such a curiosity within the youth to back track the foot prints of history, bringing to light all the injustices that took place in this country.

The Bryant Grocery store will be bought by a Civil Rights Organization, and used as a teaching tool for the Civil Rights Movement. The San Jose students will also stop off at the motel where Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated.

This is an amazing moment in time and I extend my sincere gratitude to these students for their bravery, and for producing such a documentary that'll teach children for years to come about American history.

2009 LA

Friday, January 9, 2009

Pastors and the Churches They Steal From

This past week many pastors have been busted on fraud charges. Apparently, innocent church-goers who voluntarily tithe, are being used for the pastors' personal means.

Originally, people didn't  tithe to worship as church was free for all who came to praise the Lord. Then restrictions within churches began surfacing and as a result, certain church leaders began acting as God themselves. 


God says come as you are, then it changed to come with your wallet, come dressed up and by the way if you're gay -- don't come at all.


In 1785, our first President George Washington, disagreed with a bill commenting that "Making people pay towards the support of the religion which they profess to adapt is impolitic". 

Washington felt that passing such a measure which should have never been proposed, would have disturbed public tranquility. 


So what initiated churches to begin taking cash from its constituents, in order to praise their religion of choice? 

I've been told the generated funds usually go towards the upkeep and bills of the church. But if pastors are constantly siphoning tithes from the church, how are the church bills being paid? Is there money coming from some other organization that we aren't aware of? 


Are churches exempt from filing taxes on the money they receive, so that the IRS can't track the amount of money being brought in?  


The only businesses I can think of that are exempt from paying taxes are non-profits, and non-profits are not allowed to take money from people unless it's through fundraising. 


Non-profits usually receive assistance from the government, so if the government is paying the church's bills does that mean that the civilian donations are up for grabs?


How can a pastor steal from God's people? Does this not stay on their conscience? 


I guess the devil will hide anywhere even in the pulpit, but how do we stop corrupt pastors from entering the ministry? 


Maybe we'll never be able to, but there should definitely be oversight to enforce strict rules and regulations don't you agree?


2009 LA

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Were We Tricked?

In 1852, Frank W. Woolworth was the original USA based chain of five and dime stores. Woolworth was much like a Walmart, because the products ranged from bedroom sheets to electronics. I have fond memories shopping with my mother at Woolworth as a little girl.













(The Greensboro Four seen above)


February 1, 1960 in Greensboro, North Carolina, four African American students sat at a 'White's only' lunch counter in a Woolworth department store. The students were from North Carolina’s Agricultural and Technical College: Ezell Blair Jr., Franklin McCain, Joseph McNeil, and David Richmond. 


The four men ordered food but received no service, so they remained sitting at the lunch counter until the store closed. Students began coming everyday to protest at the lunch counter -- in which the count amounted to 300 hundred protesters by the 5th day. Woolworth still wouldn't integrate; some students were even arrested and charged with trespassing. 

The arrests fueled more protests and caused a snowball effect, as students launched boycotts at segregated lunch counters across the city. 

Store revenue fell sharply and store owners were ultimately forced to give in. Six months later those same four students returned to that same lunch counter and was served food. 

These courageous acts led to the integration of many stores before the Civil Rights Act was signed into law. In 1933, an eight foot section of the lunch counter from Woolworth was moved to the Smithsonian Institution to forever mark this moment in history.

Racial tension between Black people and the Woolworth department store was even more evident, which in turn triggered a massive boycott. 

As a little girl, I remembered that the Woolworth department store suddenly disappeared and I didn't know where it went or what happened to it, all I knew was that the store in which I had become accustomed to had vanished. 

Over time I found out what happened to Woolworth, would you like to know?

Since revenue sharply declined due to poor sales as a result of the boycott, in order to get and keep the black dollar something had to be done. Woolworth decided to re-invent themselves and changed their name to Venator Group; their name was then changed to Footlocker which we all know to be a major department store today.

Woolworth decided to change its focus to athletic clothing, and even started an athletic retailer mail-order catalogue titled, East Bay

Altogether, there are 596 Woolworth stores worldwide and all of them are now under one corporate entity. And although the Woolworth name has been masked in America, there are plenty overseas in New Zealand, South Africa, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Canada, and Mexico City doing very well in profit. 

Were we tricked?


Woolworth had gone out of business in America, due to its racist attitude and the owners knew if they continued with this name they'd lose more money. 

So now we're tricked into thinking that Footlocker is a totally different store, but it's really all the same. Same people, same store, and probably the same racist agenda.

Now that I am aware of these changes will this stop me from shopping at Footlocker? 

Without a blink of an eye the first word that comes to mind is, absolutely!

2008 LA

American Corporations Built From The Slave Trade



Is it fair for companies to retain wealth that has been acquired through the slave trade, especially when slavery brought about pain and suffering for many black Americans that continues to wreak havoc on future generations? And although many of these companies still exist -- shouldn't they be made to relinquish the funds that is unfairly in their possession?


In my searches I found another corporation from the slave trade, and it has been around for over 300 hundred centuries! 

The company is called Unilever.

William Hesketh Lever, born in 1851 (seen-r) was the founder of Lever Brothers, a company that would soon make up one big corporate entity in the year 1930. 

The company produces products made of oils and fats -- principally soap and margarine, and is now one of the worlds biggest companies.

On the company's website it reads that William Hesketh Lever, wanted to help people look good, feel good, and get more out of life with his products. Apparently, he made cleanliness and hygiene very popular in Victorian England. 

What the company website fails to tell you is that this same man William Hesketh Lever, used forced labor of slaves to build his empire. 

Lever built a community and called it Port Sunlight, which housed and supported all his workers. In order to live at Port Sunlight workers had to comply with Lever's intrusive rules and mandatory participation in activities; working for him.  

Lever conned his worker's into working for him by offering them things that they didn't have, like housing and wages. However, the catch 22 was that if these worker's decided to move away, so then would their housing and wages.

You have to hand it to Lever, he was smart enough to think of a way to get his projects done all while getting his money back in the process, while making it appear as if he didn't harbor forced labor. He invested wages into laborers who became his tenants, and then received the wages right back when it came time for the laborers to pay their rent!

During the early 1900's, Lever used palm oil produced in British West African Colonies and when his supply ran out, he traveled to other colonies in search of more. 

In 1911, Lever visited the Belgian Congo to use his slaves to retrieve palm oil; his attitude towards the Congolese were reportedly very racist, controlling, brutal, and is very well documented. 

Belgian administrators, missionaries, and doctors protested against the practices at the Lever plantations, and although the Belgian Socialist Party were called to investigate the matter -- the forced labor continued up until the 1960's. 

Should this company not be investigated and made to pay for its divisive, racist, and unreasonable acts? It is documented that Lever was a liberal man, but apparently only "liberal" when it came to his pockets. 
   
2008 LA

Saturday, December 13, 2008

A Few of My Favorite Things: Black Inventors

When I think of slavery the question that often pops in my head is, "How many black inventors had their ideas stolen by the "oppressor" for personal gain?" This thought propelled me to research Black inventors.       

*Everyone has a smoke detector in their home to alert them should the house catch on fire, right? But did you know a black man by the name of Sidney Jacoby, invented the smoke and heat detector?  


Is Sidney Jacoby's Estate and family receiving royalties for his invention?


*Black inventor Henry Blair born in 1807, made the first seed planter in 1834, and the first cotton planter in 1836. There was much land to maintain and from dusk to dawn slaves maintained it. Selling cotton was profitable for masters in the South, however, profit was almost non-existent for the slaves who grew and picked it. 


Is Henry Blair's Estate and family receiving royalties for his invention?


*Black inventor Dr. Patricia Bath (seen-r), an Ophthalmologist from New York, was the first African American woman doctor to receive a patent for a medical invention. 


Bath's invention was called the Cataract Laser Phaco Probe. This extraordinary discovery helped to remove cataract lenses accurately with a laser device, while restoring sight to people who had been blind for over 30 years!


*Sarah Boone invented the ironing board. 


*In 1839 Edmond Berger, invented car spark plugs to enable automobiles to start up.


*In 1899 John Albert Burr invented the lawn mower. 


*In 1896 Charles Brooks invented improvements to street sweeper trucks, adding revolving brushes and front fender scrapers for snow pick up. Charles also designed the part of the truck which collects garbage and crushes it, using a special power lifting mechanism. Finally, Brooks invented the hole puncher which is widely used by train conductors, schools, businesses, and in homes. 


Are these inventor's families receiving royalties for their contributions to society?


*Mr. Andrew Beard was born a slave on a plantation in Woodland, Alabama. In 1881, Beard invented the field plow and in 1892, he invented a rotary engine. In 1897, Beard invented the Jenny Coupler which is a carefully structured hook that connects train cars together. Amazing isn't it!? 


Is Mr. Andrew Beard's family receiving royalties for his inventions?


*George Washington Carver (seen-r), was a Agricultural Chemist in the 1800's. Carver discovered 300 uses for peanuts and over 100 uses for soybeans, pecans, and sweet potatoes! 


Carver suggested his recipe of inventions to Southern farmers for adhesives, axle grease, bleach, buttermilk, chili sauce, fuel briquettes (which would promote sustainable human development, and preserve our environment with renewable energy if we invest in it now), ink, instant coffee, linoleum, mayonnaise, meat tenderizer, metal polish, paper, plastic, pavement, shaving cream, shoe polish, synthetic rubber, talcum powder and wood stain.  Although Carver invented all these products, he only received 3 patents for only 3 inventions!


Who currently owns the rights to Carver's other products, and is his estate and family receiving royalties for his inventions?

*Do you have 24 hour TV surveillance in your home? You can thank black inventor Marie Brown, who created the first video home security system on December 2, 1969. 

*If you have a boiler in your home or apartment building, vacuum pumps, central air conditioning, and refrigerators, you can thank black inventor David Crosthwait. He invented the heating system for New York's famous Radio City Music Hall and Rockefeller Center

Crosthwait was an expert with heat transfer, air ventilation, and central air conditioning. The current owner's of David Crosthwaits' inventions are 'Dunham-Bush' Inc., and has a main headquarters sitting in West Hartford, Connecticut.  


Who is Dunham-Bush and how did they receive the rights to Crosthwait's inventions?

*Futuristic thinker and black inventor George Carruthers (seen-r), invented the far Ultraviolet Camera Spectrograph, which was the first of its kind to be taken to the moon by Apollo 16 and astronauts in 1972. 

The camera allowed researchers to examine the Earth's atmosphere for concentrations of pollutants. Carruthers built the first telescope during young school years with teacher's often telling Carruthers, that his ideas and ways of thinking were "out in space". Ha! I guess they were right about the space part!

Whether there is documentation of negotiation on patent ownership or not for these black inventors, we know for a fact the contracts couldn't have been fair given the time period in history. An investigation should be conducted into patent ownership rights regarding slave inventors, to make sure future generations of these successful inventors are rightfully receiving their inheritance, and if not contract negotiation should be on the table. 

I find it disheartening that I wasn't taught any of this in school, but I'm overjoyed of my discovery -- and hopefully yours as well. 

2008 LA

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Are There Good Qualities To Gain From Being Poor?


Are there good qualities to gain from being poor? Or should I say less fortunate? 

It may sound a bit crass, but it's ever so true. Just think about it for a minute; if a person was born into wealth it might be hard identifying with someone of limited means, especially if you've never been around it. Wealthy people could possibly only hang with other wealthy people; same goes for the less fortunate -- which helps you understand the disconnect. People usually hang with those in their immediate surroundings.

A wealthy person is use to eating the finest foods, sleeping in the finest homes and hotels, wearing the finest clothes, vacationing whenever the mood hits them, while spending excessively without a budget. This person is financially stable and will never understand the struggle and pain of not knowing how their bills will be paid, where they'll get their next meal, or how they'll survive. The only way they'd understand is if they too have come from humble beginnings.

Then there's "Skid Row" where people are so use to struggle, that it becomes a common ritual. These people live paycheck to paycheck, struggle to put food on the table, and have break downs from built-up stress and depression. These people work 2-3 jobs just to care for their families. These people never have enough time to spend with their children, and so desperately need a helping hand. But these same people have the best quality of character and heart therefore, retaining the number one spot of compassion.

Qualities gained as a result of being less fortunate:

1) Humbleness - comes through struggle and sacrifice. When you're not use to having, you learn to appreciate what you do have. When you do better, you never forget the struggle that got you where you are. 

2) Creativity - stems from your imagination. When you have limited means and can't afford lessons or activities, you adapt by making up your own fun things to do. Can't afford piano, guitar, or swimming lessons, so you invent/create things therefore -- becoming self-sufficient.

3) Unique Sense of Style -  Name brand clothes? Ha! Yea, okay. So you buy what you can afford or "create" your own outfit, ultimately creating your own style.

4) Self-Expression - Some of our best music have come from struggle, and wonderful poetry and books. When you listen to artists' songs, you hear their stories of struggle and pain and how they used their experience through self-expression to dig them out of their hole.

5) Hardworking - The less fortunate works the hardest to catch up. Their jobs usually don't pay enough and are close-ended career wise, so another job is added to balance the rising costs of products.

6) Spiritual - Always and forever giving God the glory for allowing you to make it another day. For allowing you to wake up, to have all your 5 senses, and workable limbs, to bless you with a roof over your head, food in your belly, and clothes on your back. Most people know there is a higher power; and for that the lord is praised for lifting the load when it becomes to much to bare.

7) Loving - In less fortunate homes love is your riches. Love is what holds a family together in good times and in bad. If the struggle becomes to much, the love of family and good friends will keep a smile on your face. It's the family gatherings at Grandma's house, or a big family cook-out in the park that keep us close at heart and bonded in the family traditions of our ancestors.

These are qualities I've discovered through personal experiences and research. It would be interesting to see a fortunate person and less fortunate person, switch environments so their experiences can be used as a study guide.

2008 LA