Is the New Testament in the Holy Bible a Reincarnation of Nietzsche's "Thus Spoke Zarathustra"?

The character Zarathustra, is described as a religious innovator who lived in Persia (Modern Iran) between 1750 and 600 BCE. His ideas of God/good and Devil/evil, had far reaching effects with regards to Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

As I continued to read more and more of this fascinating literary piece of work, it dawned on me that there were way to many characteristic similarities between the two notable books. Also, the fact that the author called this particular writing the "fifth Gospel", pretty much eluded to the fact that there might be more biblical terms in store for curious readers.

Thus Spoke Zarathustra gives way to Psalm readings,

repast, the supper (as in The Last Supper?) where wine was being served although the "bread" was missing, poisonous serpents that were regarded as "knowledgeable" and "Wise", ie, the "tree of knowledge" in the Bible, eagles are regaled as excellent beast of prey that can see all -- and is commonly used in many countries flags (I thought it interesting that Mexico's flag displays an eagle biting off the head of a serpent; seen above).

Nietzsche's literature goes on to represent man as superior over woman and in the Holy Bible the word "man", was used commonly to describe both male and female characters making it even more obvious who the "dominate" sex should be. Also per the Bible, man was put on earth before woman, which I find rather interesting since historically speaking everything has always grown from "mother earth", ie, woman.

In Nietzsche's Thus Spoke Zarathustra, women were regarded as "playthings" and "pure and fine like the precious stone," in which a woman's most important job was birthing the next rulers and/or heirs. The latter description in itself screams misogyny; would this explain why certain men are very misogynistic? 

Is this why for centuries women had no rights, and were expected to be barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen? And is it coincidence that the quote was used most commonly under German Empire?

The character Zarathustra recited that "when all have denied him, only then will he return." The familiar wording is also representative of the New Testament in the Holy Bible, but in this case it is supposedly Jesus that bespeaks about people denying him -- as well as his second coming. And doesn't this make you wonder even more about a particular event that our 43rd president attended and spoke at, in which he called for the converting of all Jews to bring about the second coming of Christ?

Friedrich Nietzsche even made the statement, "To have glued this New Testament, a kind of rococo of taste in every respect, to the Old Testament to make one book, as the "Bible", as "the book par excellence" - that is perhaps the greatest audacity and "sin against the spirit" that literary Europe has on its conscience." ~Beyond Good and Evil~

I mean, you can't get anymore clearer than this as he openly admits that his people, the Germans, are responsible for taking his work and twisting his meaning to interpret what they wanted it too mean to others. 

And because Nietzsche's sister married an anti-semitic German Nazi, in which she took her brother's book and tried manipulating his words before handing it over to Hitler who acknowledged it as the Third Reich; slowly the fog starts to dissipate and the dots begin to connect as one intuitively realizes, that man had way more control over the book par excellence then we could have ever known.

During slavery in America's South, the Holy Bible was

constantly used by slave masters as a way of restoring order and obedience among the enslaved. Did the slave masters know something that the slaves didn't or were the slave masters themselves tricked into believing, that cruelty to other races must occur in order for their race -- the "white race" to prevail?

Honestly, I can go on and on and on with the extremely close similarities between Nietzsche's work and parts of the Holy Bible, but it would take up this entire page and then some -- just to break it all down. Moreover, I wanted to put it out there in case someone else wanted to dig a bit deeper; it would make for an extraordinary thesis.

Does this book explain why the divisiveness between specific countries, gave way to horrible wars in the past and currently in the present?

2014 LA